Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Refreshed by Sony WX350
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX300 (18MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX300 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years later than the WX300 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX300
E-M1 II | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | February 2013 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WX300 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX300
E-M1 II | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has sizing of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WX300 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WX300.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 166 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $330 |