Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Refreshed by Sony WX350
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX300 (18MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX300 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years later than the WX300 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX300

 E-M1 II WX300 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2013Fresher by 44 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WX300 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX300

 E-M1 II WX300 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has sizing of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WX300.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WX300 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WX300.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Sony WX300 Portrait photography factors
75
has manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
supports RAW files
36
megapixel count good (18MP)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony WX300
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers touch focus
environment proof
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (166g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Sony WX300 Sports photography information
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
49
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
environment proof
offers touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
71
lighter than average (166 grams)
megapixel count good (18MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
no Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Landscape photography camera
76
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
44
decently wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Sony WX300 Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external microphone support
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
35
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (166g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX300
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2016-09-19 2013-02-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-500mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-6.5
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.30 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MOV, H.264 AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 166 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual 1
Retail cost $1,700 $330