Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Superseded the Sony WX300
- Later Model is Sony WX500
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX350 (18MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX350 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was unveiled 2 years after the WX350 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX350 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WX350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony WX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX350
E-M1 II | WX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | February 2014 | More modern by 32 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WX350 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX350
E-M1 II | WX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony WX350 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II against the WX350.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WX350 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and WX350.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX350 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.30 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 470 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $270 |