Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony WX50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WX50 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX50 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was launched 4 years later than the WX50 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX50 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the WX50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX50

 E-M1 II WX50 
ReleasedSeptember 2016January 2012More recent by 57 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k461kClearer display (+576k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WX50 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX50

 E-M1 II WX50 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II versus the WX50.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WX50 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and WX50.

As you have seen, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony WX50
75
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
34
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony WX50
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great high ISO (25,600)
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (117 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX50 as a Sports photography camera
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
high fps (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect AF
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
44
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Sony WX50 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
provides touch focus
good resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery life (350 shots)
69
lighter than average (117g)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony WX50
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
2 card slots
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
38
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Sony WX50 Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone support
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
35
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (117g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX50
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2012-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - Clearfoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 240 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 Single
Launch price $1,700 $250