Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WX50 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX50 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

The E-M1 II was launched 4 years later than the WX50 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX50 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the WX50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX50
E-M1 II | WX50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 57 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+576k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WX50 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX50
E-M1 II | WX50 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has proportions of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II versus the WX50.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WX50 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and WX50.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Launch price | $1,700 | $250 |