Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a85a/9a85a4749dcb02d0cfee7a599953a613ec63c5b3" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front"
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
- Older Model is Sony WX350
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX500, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX500 (18MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX500 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 18 months later than the WX500 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX500 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WX500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX500
E-M1 II | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2015 | Fresher by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WX500 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX500
E-M1 II | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony WX500 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II against the WX500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c7ec/6c7ec8c452c44a475ab08eedf558275cd92d0970" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WX500 is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e0e9/1e0e962d63a2aa8e82d8ffb85bebe529f1929164" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WX500.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27c21/27c215a01ecddf106222300841d81a25c27fb5bb" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6409/f6409e49e0218af1ea4384f87c316fb4fcc83409" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 360 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $348 |