Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Replaced the Sony A33
  • Replacement is Sony A37
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A35, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years later than the A35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades vs the A35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A35

 E-M1 II A35 
RevealedSeptember 2016September 2011More recent by 61 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k921kSharper display (+116k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A35 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A35

 E-M1 II A35 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A35 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II against the A35.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and A35 is 68 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A35.

Clearly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will show more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A35 as a Portrait photography camera
75
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Sony A35 Street photography advice
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus by touch
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
71
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (415g)
great high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony A35 as a Sports photography camera
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect AF
low battery life (350 CIPA)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames/s)
not so great battery (440 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony A35
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment proof
supports focus by touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
low battery life (350 CIPA)
58
lighter than competition (415 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse recording
not so great battery (440 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A35 as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
2 card slots
low battery life (350 per charge)
69
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
not so great battery (440 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Sony A35 Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic support
lighter than competition in class (574g)
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external microphone support
lighter than competition (415 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A35
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony SLT-A35
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony SLT-A35
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2016-09-19 2011-09-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 415g (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 74
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 12.7
DXO Low light score 1312 763
Other
Battery life 350 shots 440 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual Single
Price at launch $1,700 $598