Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony SLT-A55 front
Portability
67
Imaging
56
Features
80
Overall
65

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Announced August 2010
  • Refreshed by Sony A57
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the A55 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores against the A55 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A55

 E-M1 II A55 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016August 2010Newer by 74 months
Display resolution1037k921kSharper display (+116k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A55 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A55

 E-M1 II A55 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A55 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A55.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A55 is 68 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A55.

As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Sony A55 Portrait photography info
75
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW formats
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography details
Sony A55 Street photography details
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
77
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography details
Sony A55 Sports photography details
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
supports phase detect auto focus
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery (380 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Sony A55 Travel photography info
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
supports focus by touch
decent MP (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
62
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (380 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony A55 Landscape photography factors
76
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
has dual storage slots
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
67
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
terrible battery (380 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
Sony A55 Vlogging information
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with mic jack
lighter than others in class (574g)
78
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A55
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony SLT-A55
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony SLT-A55
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2016-09-19 2010-08-24
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 1,150 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 500 grams (1.10 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 73
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 12.4
DXO Low light score 1312 816
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 380 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 Single
Pricing at launch $1,700 $800