Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
67 Imaging
55 Features
80 Overall
65
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced August 2010
- Refreshed by Sony A57
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the A55 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores against the A55 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony SLT-A55. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A55
| E-M1 II | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 | August 2010 | Newer by 74 months | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| A55 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A55
| E-M1 II | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A55 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A55.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A55 is 68 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A55.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A55 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-08-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 816 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $800 |