Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
67 Imaging
55 Features
80 Overall
65
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced August 2010
- Refreshed by Sony A57
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the A55 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores against the A55 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony SLT-A55. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A55
| E-M1 II | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 | August 2010 | Newer by 74 months | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| A55 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A55
| E-M1 II | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A55 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A55 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A55.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A55 is 68 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A55.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A55 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A55 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-08-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 816 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $800 |