Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Released November 2011
  • Newer Model is Sony A68
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Overview

The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A65, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A65 (24MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the A65 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A65

 E-M1 II A65 
ReleasedSeptember 2016November 2011Newer by 59 months
Display resolution1037k921kCrisper display (+116k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A65 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A65

 E-M1 II A65 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") along with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the A65.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A65 is 68 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A65.

As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A65 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
77
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Sony A65 Street photography features
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than competition (574g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
77
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony A65 as a Sports photography camera
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect autofocus
terrible battery (350 shots)
81
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony A65
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather proof
supports touch to focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
68
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A65 as a Landscape photography camera
76
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proof
has double storage slots
terrible battery (350 shots)
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Sony A65 Vlogging features
79
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic port
lighter than competition (574g)
78
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A65
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony SLT-A65
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony SLT-A65
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2016-09-19 2011-11-15
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 622 grams (1.37 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 74
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 12.6
DXO Low light rating 1312 717
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 560 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Two One
Launch pricing $1,700 $700