Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Released November 2011
- Newer Model is Sony A68
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A65, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A65 (24MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the A65 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A65
E-M1 II | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | November 2011 | Newer by 59 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A65 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A65
E-M1 II | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") along with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the A65.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A65 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A65.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will deliver extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A65 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 622 grams (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 560 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $700 |