Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Released September 2018

Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II versus Zeiss ZX1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Zeiss. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZX1 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was revealed 24 months earlier than the ZX1 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 II scores vs the ZX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Zeiss ZX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Zeiss ZX1
E-M1 II | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZX1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 24 months |
Display size | 4.34" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+1.34") |
Display resolution | 2765k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+1728k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Zeiss ZX1
E-M1 II | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Zeiss ZX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the ZX1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and ZX1 is 68 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The pic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and ZX1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will produce extra detail because of its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Zeiss |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Zeiss ZX1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2018-09-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 37MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7488 x 4992 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 255 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2-22 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 4.34" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 2,765 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 6,221 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | 512GB internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | - |