Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 III was unveiled 4 years later than the E-M10 II and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-M1 III matches up against the E-M10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus E-M10 II

 E-M1 III E-M10 II 
ReleasedFebruary 2020August 2015More recent by 55 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-M1 III

 E-M10 II E-M1 III 
Screen resolution1040k1037kCrisper screen (+3k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II

 E-M1 III E-M10 II 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III offers exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III versus the E-M10 II.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and E-M10 II is 67 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and E-M10 II.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus E-M1 III to provide you with extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography info
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography info
77
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
72
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with touch focus
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
83
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
good ISO range (25,600)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography details
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography details
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
79
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
comes with touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
73
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography features
81
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging information
Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging information
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have mic port
35
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIOlympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2020-02-11 2015-08-25
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW files
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 81
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580g (1.28 lbs) 390g (0.86 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 842
Other
Battery life 420 photographs 320 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 2 One
Retail pricing $1,800 $499