Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was unveiled 4 years later than the E-M10 II and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-M1 III matches up against the E-M10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-M1 III | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2015 | More recent by 55 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
E-M10 II | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II
E-M1 III | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III offers exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III versus the E-M10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0a6f/f0a6f14ba4a9b94a54bd30ab9edb81a80ef64328" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and E-M10 II is 67 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64f6a/64f6a5296c85e898713bad3e895994e42fa29f6d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and E-M10 II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus E-M1 III to provide you with extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc551/dc551dc877121e61e3f1ed5c2ca7b855cfe691ad" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57c7b/57c7b63ac0d17b799e3e1961373963754338befa" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 81 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 390g (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $499 |