Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus E-PM2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 III was released 6 years after the E-PM2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 III matches up against the E-PM2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus E-PM2
E-M1 III | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2013 | Newer by 82 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-M1 III
E-PM2 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-PM2
E-M1 III | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III vs the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c4cb/2c4cb0b013cea7f31d9335ca25685d470a5c2d66" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and E-PM2 is 67 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d8a0/5d8a0ba1b72e8c6a698c902c6958a5644ddfaca7" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and E-PM2.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M1 III to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ee79/5ee7901120d7faf6dc6ef17a45b4cec94f83038e" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f5b5/3f5b541965055a610b6b2fdee317e69c46a58581" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Price at launch | $1,800 | $448 |