Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 III was announced 7 years after the SH-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M1 III grades against the SH-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus SH-50. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SH-50
E-M1 III | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 87 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-M1 III
SH-50 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50
E-M1 III | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III against the SH-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e95e4/e95e413e83545533b4486c7f5f2896591238e5f1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and SH-50 is 67 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/955ea/955ea320f27f71ca363b75ad0cd6643f3d31d66b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and SH-50.
To sum up, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6203/c6203db2216d26896ab9bc6192c9196e44ca0d9d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d54/96d54b06fc987b7c1038b75160ed8b9fe2684df4" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SH-50 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $300 |