Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 III was announced 7 years after the SH-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M1 III grades against the SH-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SH-50

 E-M1 III SH-50 
RevealedFebruary 2020January 2013Newer by 87 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 SH-50 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50

 E-M1 III SH-50 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III against the SH-50.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and SH-50 is 67 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and SH-50.

To sum up, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography factors
77
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW formats
44
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
provides face detect focus
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus SH-50 as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers touch to focus
weather proofing
very good ISO range (25,600)
64
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
lighter than competition (269g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Olympus SH-50
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
48
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography details
Olympus SH-50 Travel photography details
79
weather proofing
supports bluetooth
offers touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (269g)
comes with touch focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography details
Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography details
81
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
has double storage slots
49
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Olympus SH-50
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes external mic port
34
relatively wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (269g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-50
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIOlympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus SH-50
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-02-11 2013-01-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 15 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 269 grams (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 2 1
Pricing at launch $1,800 $300