Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was brought out 11 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 135 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M1 III
SP-565UZ | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III against the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f111/1f11167c1d01bc77b18256b91b0e40b0973266d0" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and SP-565UZ is 67 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7badf/7badffda0960b99a40638798cde6aa602ee1dbcc" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will show more detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/140fa/140fa28281209c27c39257d988de679de2053755" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54421/54421e7451247b0cd07a30de6170b9fc5e9ebf14" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $400 |