Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 10 years after the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M1 III | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 123 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 III
SP-600 UZ | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M1 III | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae3af/ae3afb44bd08d5c2fedeabb0fa940db1e5947c1d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and SP-600 UZ is 67 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba420/ba420e6d830c56cf9649049fac3dfb29bec56ab1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and SP-600 UZ.
Plainly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will show more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01233/01233502e992dd23593f748b65d675441db471a6" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6336/b63361103a68d2651e142c9186d43d0139fd5c22" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $189 |