Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-2, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 III was introduced 4 years after the SH-2 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up against the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SH-2
E-M1 III | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | March 2015 | Newer by 60 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-M1 III
SH-2 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-2
E-M1 III | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the SH-2.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and SH-2 is 67 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The pic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and SH-2.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 380 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $399 |