Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 III was brought out 4 years later than the SH-3 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the SH-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SH-3
| E-M1 III | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | February 2016 | More recent by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| SH-3 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-3
| E-M1 III | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has got exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III versus the SH-3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and SH-3 is 67 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and SH-3.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | 380 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $579 |