Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 III was brought out 4 years later than the SH-3 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the SH-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus SH-3
| E-M1 III | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | February 2016 | More recent by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| SH-3 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus SH-3
| E-M1 III | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has got exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III versus the SH-3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and SH-3 is 67 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and SH-3.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | 380 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $579 |