Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus 6020, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 III was announced 10 years after the 6020 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M1 III grades vs the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus 6020
| E-M1 III | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 | February 2010 | More modern by 123 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| 6020 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus 6020
| E-M1 III | 6020 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III against the 6020.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and 6020 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and 6020.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Alternative name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,800 | $279 |