Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus 6020, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 III was announced 10 years after the 6020 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M1 III grades vs the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus 6020
| E-M1 III | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 | February 2010 | More modern by 123 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| 6020 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus 6020
| E-M1 III | 6020 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III against the 6020.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and 6020 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and 6020.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide extra detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Alternative name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,800 | $279 |