Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-860, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 5 years later than the TG-860 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the TG-860 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-860
E-M1 III | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2015 | Fresher by 62 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M1 III
TG-860 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-860
E-M1 III | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III provides exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-860 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09619/09619440bf1a8058cf2f2543a6337514f770d653" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TG-860 is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb825/bb825e42d51b63e74dc9d67a7799a3ef7dd197f3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and TG-860.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ddb0/1ddb0e5d6ed2d9744ef533bba94ac9f6a4d0c620" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f46/06f46e106f250d0cba4a507f0f66565ff7a3bd64" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 300 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch price | $1,800 | $279 |