Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 III was revealed 9 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-310
| E-M1 III | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 111 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| TG-310 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-310
| E-M1 III | TG-310 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the TG-310.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TG-310 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and TG-310.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,800 | $0 |