Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 III was revealed 9 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-310
| E-M1 III | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 111 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| TG-310 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-310
| E-M1 III | TG-310 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the TG-310.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TG-310 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and TG-310.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,800 | $0 |