Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 III was manufactured 8 years later than the TG-320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 III scores against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-320
E-M1 III | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 99 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M1 III
TG-320 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-320
E-M1 III | TG-320 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III vs the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/194aa/194aaa7e85b1eb282ae0c3a171bd8ef660227c8e" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and TG-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b8cd/9b8cdea4b614742829f479348a549be298fcb72c" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb2a9/cb2a9872689ee319d62429d18014e6eb08336568" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90054/900542aa80a0b049ec8d799494e614a52edb2078" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 150 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $0 |