Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 III was unveiled 8 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-M1 III matches up against the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M1 III | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 98 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1030k | Crisper screen (+7k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 III
TG-820 iHS | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M1 III | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d0ba/3d0ba62ed8c418fca26025cd9026361ee7282a43" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TG-820 iHS is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e58f/6e58f9a7b20e6f4f854b67d01fd99603324b5342" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and TG-820 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer you extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/441de/441de3895944d22b3bbce1f6b8998ea8094e871b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0964/c09647ccda12496b99ae360bdbfdc4bde147f4af" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 220 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $500 |