Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus TG-5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 2 years later than the TG-5 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 III grades against the TG-5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-5
E-M1 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2017 | More recent by 34 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M1 III
TG-5 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-5
E-M1 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III has exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus TG-5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III versus the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5101/d5101467530cf09bda0cda4f64d3cffcec5c3351" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and TG-5 is 67 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55bc8/55bc8c4c6e11ae3da464147a39c376e179d59dec" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and TG-5.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9e81/a9e817baf4ea4c3034b61be8aa05c3c0a342823b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcf9b/bcf9bdc0853d7797ee7d292b345088c6872a8fd1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 340 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $449 |