Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VG-160, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 8 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades vs the VG-160 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus VG-160
E-M1 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 99 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M1 III
VG-160 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VG-160
E-M1 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/997cf/997cffa0171a0945b3d92a22d8d754a710e57a5b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and VG-160 is 67 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98026/98026a9a39a41c81963a88a977ea0b2b30a4fcf1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and VG-160.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will render greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/030c8/030c8ba36ceed52f1c795f8ca281d6838c198f56" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbbb1/dbbb1ae7bf463b0d563fff6fca56e27d0ec407ff" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus VG-160 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 165 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $90 |