Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 III was manufactured 9 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M1 III grades versus the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 111 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+423k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M1 III
XZ-1 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c29aa/c29aa4de94a65f77d3bcb5341f842e161b0bdd0b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and XZ-1 is 67 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8517/a8517fcaab77fa6475843f71eacf460f9dbd40b3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide more detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa952/fa9524d975b5aa7bb0d618eadee0ae63eeea0ac5" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92b44/92b44f60d3ab3bc4be294de009b076a08b0f9cb7" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 320 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $567 |