Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 III was launched 7 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 III grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M1 III XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedFebruary 2020December 2012More recent by 88 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kClearer screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 III

 XZ-2 iHS E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M1 III XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and XZ-2 iHS is 67 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and XZ-2 iHS.

As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
46
you can focus manually
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features focus via touch
weather proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
66
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography factors
79
weather proofing
supports bluetooth
features focus via touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
61
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
81
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
55
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external microphone jack
36
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes mic port
does not feature selfie friendly screen
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2020-02-11 2012-12-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 35
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580g (1.28 lbs) 346g (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life 420 photographs 340 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Dual 1
Launch pricing $1,800 $450