Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 III was launched 7 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 III grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | December 2012 | More recent by 88 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 III
XZ-2 iHS | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and XZ-2 iHS is 67 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $450 |