Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91ad5/91ad5e514da76ad1d9861eaed95587ec8bf1145d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Mark II front Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Mark II front"
59 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Increase to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 5952 x 3968 video
- Leica L Mount
- 740g - 134 x 102 x 90mm
- Announced January 2023
- Succeeded the Panasonic S5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic S5 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the S5 II (24MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and S5 II (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 III was brought out 3 years before the S5 II and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 III grades versus the S5 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Mark II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Panasonic S5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic S5 II
E-M1 III | S5 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S5 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
S5 II | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2023 | ![]() | February 2020 | More recent by 35 months |
Display resolution | 1840k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer display (+803k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic S5 II
E-M1 III | S5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3.00" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Panasonic S5 II has sizing of 134mm x 102mm x 90mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 740 grams (1.63 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic S5 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III vs the S5 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caba7/caba79ae8322785c60a975845e62e20bb7bd9f39" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and S5 II is 67 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50f22/50f228559a3127166021f76f8fab24d224ccf649" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and S5 II.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic S5 II will resolve extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-M1 III is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35285/35285a65b922e1161cbb5731da35d34771ea7cca" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38215/38215fc032e8ca1961c74f02cad0d3de21e231b2" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic S5 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2023-01-04 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 779 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Available lenses | 107 | 65 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,840k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 3,680k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 5952 x 3968 @ 30p/24p |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 5952x3968 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 740g (1.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 134 x 102 x 90mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 370 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | DMW-BLJ31 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD Memory Card, SDHC Memory Card, SDXC Memory Card |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $2,000 |