Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c53/58c53fd189a0b402571d0bfc738fe9c100c02101" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FH27 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 9 years after the FH27 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH27 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 III grades vs the FH27 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FH27
E-M1 III | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 111 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus E-M1 III
FH27 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FH27
E-M1 III | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Panasonic FH27 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III and the FH27.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1924f/1924f9f973eb7fbd3fc3f5aabdf240be004c868b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and FH27 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4459/d4459b08ea4bf0e63046239c08179b09d44f2bc1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and FH27.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af475/af475f0f1c68118970ec37075e64db82ff03f028" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/749c8/749c8e35a6210d41c4c27daff3c2e390c2952169" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 250 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $229 |