Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FP2
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FP2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 III was introduced 10 years later than the FP2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 III grades against the FP2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FP2

 E-M1 III FP2 
ReleasedFebruary 2020January 2010Fresher by 123 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 FP2 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FP2

 E-M1 III FP2 

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FP2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III and the FP2.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and FP2 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and FP2.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FP2 Portrait photography factors
77
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography highlights
Panasonic FP2 Street photography highlights
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports touch focus
environment sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (151 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Panasonic FP2
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect auto focus
35
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14MP)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FP2 as a Travel photography camera
79
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
56
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (151g)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FP2 Landscape photography highlights
81
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
33
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Panasonic FP2
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with microphone port
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (151 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FP2
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2010-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX Venus Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.90 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 gr (1.28 lbs) 151 gr (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Dual Single
Retail price $1,800 $80