Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FS25, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FS25 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 III was announced 11 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the FS25 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FS25
E-M1 III | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 135 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-M1 III
FS25 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FS25
E-M1 III | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/138d9/138d9f89a79a9a23e58ec72beef5d97c6ad9821d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and FS25 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6e6/dc6e681ec19d12009621935150b58d375ca43a1f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and FS25.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will show greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21a83/21a8307e91988da4eecbbc909eb05051589bf1ac" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8791/b879155424004956fa495288aac1b3bbbe6fa226" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $230 |