Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FX75, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 III was introduced 9 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FX75

 E-M1 III FX75 
ReleasedFebruary 2020June 2010Fresher by 119 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 FX75 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FX75

 E-M1 III FX75 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III versus the FX75.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and FX75 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and FX75.

As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX75
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Street photography highlights
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides focus by touch
weather proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch to focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Panasonic FX75
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
39
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Travel photography with Panasonic FX75
79
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
provides focus by touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
67
has touch to focus
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FX75 Landscape photography factors
81
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
37
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external mic jack
31
pretty wide (24mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Also called - Lumix DMC-FX70
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2010-06-01
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.40 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 pounds) 165 grams (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 2 1
Launch pricing $1,800 $139