Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FZ35, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 III was announced 9 years after the FZ35 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1 III scores vs the FZ35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FZ35
| E-M1 III | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 117 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| FZ35 | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FZ35
| E-M1 III | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has sizing of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and FZ35 is 67 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and FZ35.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III provides an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.50 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 2 | One |
| Launch pricing | $1,800 | $999 |
