Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffc9b/ffc9b6f8b93e211fb924b3e5477a91660f2c5205" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT3
- Succeeded the Panasonic TS2
- Successor is Panasonic TS4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TS3 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TS3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 8 years after the TS3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 III grades vs the TS3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic TS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic TS3
E-M1 III | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 104 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Olympus E-M1 III
TS3 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic TS3
E-M1 III | TS3 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS3 has proportions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III and the TS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e68/13e680fe06172b1fded9406d82659e42b05e77f7" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TS3 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d00/b6d009f46b57787f3d0470582e1e254e02f8478e" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and TS3.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0287/e0287390ab266ee3dbc96b9c4a1c4a7997e48067" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65fad/65fad907dbe149bd8495366453bdca872126c3f4" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic TS3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FT3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1300s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 197g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 310 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $380 |