Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic ZR1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 III was brought out 10 years later than the ZR1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the ZR1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic ZR1
E-M1 III | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 129 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-M1 III
ZR1 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic ZR1
E-M1 III | ZR1 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic ZR1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 III vs the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95b93/95b93f91fd5ec39c6a90ec7fed686dd17929b06b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and ZR1 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1efe9/1efe96b9c1eac3e2c696dc5c58b0a0dfb0884536" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and ZR1.
As you can see, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/908b9/908b9d306a3a5bc5adf44ce782abe4ea1171dd80" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f16d/8f16d804e6df2993bd1af9fb62dcbd707e303d19" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.10 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $280 |