Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c20/25c200bbfc081616744826f0a4654558e906b113" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front"
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic ZS30, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the ZS30 (18MP) is fairly close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 III was brought out 7 years after the ZS30 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M1 III grades versus the ZS30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic ZS30
E-M1 III | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 87 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-M1 III
ZS30 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic ZS30
E-M1 III | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS30 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Panasonic ZS30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III and the ZS30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f4fe/4f4fe3d8c457034d97c91e298a954d4d5a14b8d5" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and ZS30 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a869c/a869c940d39a642f5c671e306c5117ee0c3fd365" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and ZS30.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf009/cf0096bbcc81bd36d3cb7c7d73c404f5d12c77e0" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f72c/7f72cc5a77a6eea93ab3922d8278acd98a4a27a2" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1200s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 198g (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 260 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Retail cost | $1,800 | $250 |