Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
60 Imaging
57 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Released June 2013
- Earlier Model is Pentax K-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and K-5 II (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and K-5 II (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 III was introduced 6 years later than the K-5 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the K-5 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Pentax K-5 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax K-5 II
| E-M1 III | K-5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | June 2013 | More recent by 82 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Clearer screen (+116k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
| K-5 II | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-5 II
| E-M1 III | K-5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Pentax K-5 II has dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the K-5 II.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and K-5 II is 67 and 60 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and K-5 II.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-5 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-5 II |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2013-06-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic IX | Prime II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
| Cross focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lb) | 760 grams (1.68 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 82 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1235 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | 980 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Dual | One |
| Price at launch | $1,800 | $830 |