Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b9c/e7b9c0b506f513767cee1d8a81b2fe4a9c03cd0e" alt="Pentax K-5 IIs front Pentax K-5 IIs front"
60 Imaging
57 Features
83 Overall
67
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Released June 2013
- Earlier Model is Pentax K-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax K-5 IIs, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and K-5 IIs (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and K-5 IIs (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 III was launched 6 years later than the K-5 IIs and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 IIs being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 III grades versus the K-5 IIs in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Pentax K-5 IIs. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Pentax K-5 IIs Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax K-5 IIs
E-M1 III | K-5 IIs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | June 2013 | More recent by 82 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 IIs over the Olympus E-M1 III
K-5 IIs | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-5 IIs
E-M1 III | K-5 IIs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Pentax K-5 IIs has proportions of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") and a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax K-5 IIs in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the K-5 IIs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/158b3/158b3a4383d8856595d163e679cb6ea8cb5a701f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and K-5 IIs is 67 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f019e/f019e9745701a93c0c573cbee5fb23d1b1b61743" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and K-5 IIs.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus E-M1 III will render greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb88/adb88423cc8e12d80b6a0bb75e07e88230b21259" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbc63/cbc630cffd5d94f14553404b933c2f212b6037a1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-5 IIs Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-5 IIs | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-5 IIs |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2013-06-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 760 gr (1.68 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 980 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Price at launch | $1,800 | $749 |