Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11a68/11a6819c11da53ce7368b61f9758fa6320547435" alt="Pentax K-70 front Pentax K-70 front"
62 Imaging
67 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Launched June 2016
- Replacement is Pentax KF
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-70, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the K-70 (24MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and K-70 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 III was launched 3 years after the K-70 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-70 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 III scores vs the K-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Pentax K-70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Pentax K-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax K-70
E-M1 III | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | June 2016 | Newer by 45 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+116k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-70 over the Olympus E-M1 III
K-70 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-70
E-M1 III | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-70 has measurements of 126mm x 93mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 688 grams (1.52 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the K-70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff9e/dff9ef458c4bc7c2bf2af868e57631b280d9c9d3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and K-70 is 67 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c347/9c347b5121b71753ce293d63bf06f4803d336b2b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and K-70.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-70 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1840/e18400523271bd6419653f778b0e9689241c54e4" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e2d5/1e2d5c270c32cb7b0620cbef4dd0152c26f9d500" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-70 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2016-06-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 688 grams (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 410 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $649 |