Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f5c/17f5cd4f03c94030eab99c5ab77b6a4371e5b9be" alt="Pentax K-S2 front Pentax K-S2 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Pentax K-S1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the K-S2 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and K-S2 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 III was manufactured 5 years later than the K-S2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the K-S2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Pentax K-S2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax K-S2
E-M1 III | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2015 | Fresher by 61 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus E-M1 III
K-S2 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-S2
E-M1 III | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Pentax K-S2 has specifications of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III vs the K-S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0304c/0304c019df5b7b5bfddaca13f610bed93ef8cade" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and K-S2 is 67 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d341/7d34154293417741595d1905296e6b2b4afe06b0" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and K-S2.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact MP but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 III features the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF harder. The newer E-M1 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85a27/85a27d031c19b9419fe62314797e47308cd96328" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b92e2/b92e29648e74925b046455a3e009de2abb4538eb" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-S2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 5.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lb) | 678 grams (1.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 410 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $581 |