Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40ec3/40ec3edada586daa79cb0534b5c4f85df6917a23" alt="Pentax Optio RZ10 front Pentax Optio RZ10 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax RZ10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and RZ10 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 8 years after the RZ10 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 III grades vs the RZ10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Pentax Optio RZ10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax RZ10
E-M1 III | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 105 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-M1 III
RZ10 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax RZ10
E-M1 III | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax RZ10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the RZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3fda/b3fdaf1374c342e7674b10360dc3c672dad2c28f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and RZ10 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022d7/022d79b5c563d75bc5bf0be61927fe6049e64d1b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and RZ10.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e69c6/e69c625deae070497c65094c448a7391538eb7e5" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34bf4/34bf4f93cde56f505f71f4db01046b15d54739c3" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 178 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch price | $1,800 | $200 |