Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 III was announced 8 years after the WG-1 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 III scores against the WG-1 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M1 III | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 104 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 III
WG-1 GPS | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M1 III | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe6bc/fe6bc65fe11c52ede94ad25ce38f59a4b6582c90" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and WG-1 GPS is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9adbf/9adbf96a74177aeeb3fd0254e1c7fa8feb8c8972" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and WG-1 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e30fe/e30fe81659c2c5273ff54af77b7e52a6ce5c1a61" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7287/b7287d95d26f281d433d8899488894ab8b1ba62f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 260 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Price at launch | $1,800 | $350 |