Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 5 years after the Q-S1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III grades against the Q-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax Q-S1
E-M1 III | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | August 2014 | More modern by 68 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-M1 III
Q-S1 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax Q-S1
E-M1 III | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30ffe/30ffe39363d334d91bec2467b4a36c7a1fae74b0" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and Q-S1 is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccdb3/ccdb3afd97fc05d91361e1d74120b07b3565f037" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and Q-S1.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e346/2e3463fbe631df2c8c5e21bf1d59d64cf94d50c8" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21a63/21a6336f1fded5e3c7b3879d2f82389b63fd4a98" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 107 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 203 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $250 |