Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 III was manufactured 10 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M1 III grades against the GR Digital III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| E-M1 III | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 | July 2009 | More modern by 129 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-M1 III
| GR Digital III | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital III
| E-M1 III | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III has exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III and the GR Digital III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and GR Digital III is 67 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and GR Digital III.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic IX | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Launch price | $1,800 | $399 |