Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 III was introduced 8 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III grades against the GR Digital IV in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M1 III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 103 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-M1 III
GR Digital IV | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M1 III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c964/1c964ca8ca063156fdcd37c911733884ca50eee9" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and GR Digital IV is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ff02/6ff024874c6c7472f1c50234c3c8e6ca84f191ff" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and GR Digital IV.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will render more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1405f/1405f1017e47a5dc0db1eff139b3e424854a0c32" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dff2/5dff26c1dd126b29ed85296af9b134c2beff198c" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 390 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Retail price | $1,800 | $599 |