Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 III was launched 4 years after the GR II which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 III scores versus the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh GR II

 E-M1 III GR II 
IntroducedFebruary 2020June 2015More modern by 57 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M1 III

 GR II E-M1 III 
Display resolution1230k1037kClearer display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR II

 E-M1 III GR II 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III and the GR II.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and GR II is 67 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and GR II.

As you have seen, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
75
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography factors
Ricoh GR II Street photography factors
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch to focus
weather proof
great ISO range (25,600)
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography features
Ricoh GR II Sports photography features
81
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
high max fps (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
50
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
79
weather proof
supports bluetooth
provides touch to focus
good resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
67
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
81
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
2 card slots
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR II Vlogging factors
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have microphone support
32
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (251g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIRicoh GR II
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Ricoh GR II
Type Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2015-06-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX GR Engine V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-16.0
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 300 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580g (1.28 pounds) 251g (0.55 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 1078
Other
Battery life 420 photographs 320 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 2 One
Launch pricing $1,800 $599