Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh GR
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 III was launched 4 years after the GR II which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 III scores versus the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh GR II
E-M1 III | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | June 2015 | More modern by 57 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M1 III
GR II | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1037k | Clearer display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GR II
E-M1 III | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 III and the GR II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and GR II is 67 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and GR II.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 300 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 251g (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 320 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Launch pricing | $1,800 | $599 |