Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 III was introduced 10 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 III matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| E-M1 III | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 | March 2010 | More recent by 121 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-M1 III
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| E-M1 III | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 67 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you more detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-02-11 | 2010-03-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 grams (1.28 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 photos | 410 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Two | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $1,800 | $349 |