Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 III was unveiled 6 years after the WG-4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh WG-4

 E-M1 III WG-4 
ReleasedFebruary 2020February 2014Newer by 74 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 WG-4 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-4

 E-M1 III WG-4 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III vs the WG-4.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and WG-4 is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and WG-4.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography information
76
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
40
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features touch to focus
environment proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography factors
79
environment proof
has bluetooth
features touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
72
environment proofing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery power (240 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
81
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
53
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
not so great battery power (240 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with microphone socket
36
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-4
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIRicoh WG-4
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Ricoh WG-4
Category Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2020-02-11 2014-02-05
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580g (1.28 pounds) 230g (0.51 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 pictures 240 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Two One
Pricing at launch $1,800 $330