Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Updated by Ricoh WG-80
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and WG-70 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 III was launched within a month of the WG-70 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up against the WG-70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Ricoh WG-70

 E-M1 III WG-70 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 WG-70 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-70

 E-M1 III WG-70 
LaunchedFebruary 2020February 2020Same generation
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 III versus Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III against the WG-70.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and WG-70 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and WG-70.

As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will render more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography highlights
76
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW files
42
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography information
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
includes touch to focus
environment sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-70
80
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
49
image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography info
79
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
includes touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
71
weather proof
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography highlights
81
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
48
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has microphone jack
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIRicoh WG-70
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Ricoh WG-70
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2020-02-11 2020-02-04
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual On, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 images 300 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 2 One
Price at launch $1,800 $280