Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternate Name is PL10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung CL5, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and CL5 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 III was brought out 11 years after the CL5 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M1 III grades vs the CL5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Samsung CL5

 E-M1 III CL5 
ReleasedFebruary 2020February 2009Newer by 134 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 CL5 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung CL5

 E-M1 III CL5 

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III and the CL5.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and CL5 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and CL5.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will render greater detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW files
24
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography details
Samsung CL5 Street photography details
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch to focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography highlights
Samsung CL5 Sports photography highlights
81
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung CL5 as a Travel photography camera
79
weather proof
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly display
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (9MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Samsung CL5
81
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
two card slots
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging info
Samsung CL5 Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
25
provides face detection focus
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung CL5
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISamsung CL5
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Samsung CL5
Alternate name - PL10
Type Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2020-02-11 2009-02-23
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 38-114mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lb) 141 grams (0.31 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Launch cost $1,800 $391