Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
34
Features
32
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The E-M1 III was manufactured 9 years after the HZ25W which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 III scores versus the HZ25W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Samsung HZ25W

 E-M1 III HZ25W 
ReleasedFebruary 2020July 2010More modern by 117 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-M1 III

 HZ25W E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung HZ25W

 E-M1 III HZ25W 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III and the HZ25W.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and HZ25W is 67 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and HZ25W.

To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ25W
76
manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
exports RAW files
33
focusing manually
exports RAW files
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Street photography highlights
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts touch to focus
environment sealing
above average high ISO (25,600)
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography advice
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography advice
80
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
33
amazing zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography advice
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography advice
79
environment sealing
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
great zoom (624mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Landscape photography camera
81
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging info
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging info
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic socket
24
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung HZ25W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISamsung HZ25W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Samsung HZ25W
Also called as - WB5000
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-02-11 2010-07-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 200 64
RAW format
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-624mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.60 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580g (1.28 pounds) 428g (0.94 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Two Single
Retail pricing $1,800 $350