Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-M1 III was manufactured 9 years after the HZ25W which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 III scores versus the HZ25W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Samsung HZ25W
| E-M1 III | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | July 2010 | More modern by 117 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-M1 III
| HZ25W | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung HZ25W
| E-M1 III | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III and the HZ25W.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and HZ25W is 67 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The image here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and HZ25W.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | - | WB5000 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580g (1.28 pounds) | 428g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Two | Single |
| Retail pricing | $1,800 | $350 |