Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 III was unveiled 9 years after the HZ35W which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 III HZ35W 
LaunchedFebruary 2020June 2010More modern by 118 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k614kSharper screen (+423k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1 III

 HZ35W E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 III HZ35W 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 III versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III vs the HZ35W.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and HZ35W is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and HZ35W.

As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer you greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
76
manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
saves RAW files
34
has manual focus
supports face detect focusing
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Samsung HZ35W
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus via touch
environment sealing
above average high ISO (25,600)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Sports photography with Samsung HZ35W
80
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high fps (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography features
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography features
79
environment sealing
has bluetooth
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than competition in class (245g)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography factors
81
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
43
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone socket
31
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISamsung HZ35W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Samsung HZ35W
Also referred to as - WB650
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-02-11 2010-06-16
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 2 Single
Pricing at release $1,800 $300