Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300
Portability
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Portability
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Samsung NX300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 III was manufactured 6 years later than the NX300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 III grades versus the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Samsung NX300
| E-M1 III | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | November 2013 | More recent by 76 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 768k | Crisper screen (+269k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| NX300 | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Samsung NX300
| E-M1 III | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 III versus the NX300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and NX300 is 67 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and NX300.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III has got the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF more challenging. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Portrait photography with Samsung NX300
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
saves RAW files
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography features
Samsung NX300 Street photography features
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
provides touch to focus
weather proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
good ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography advice
Samsung NX300 Sports photography advice
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000s)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect AF
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography information
Samsung NX300 Travel photography information
weather proofing
has bluetooth
provides touch to focus
MP count decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX300 as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
has double storage slots
you can focus manually
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
decent sized screen (3.3 inch)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Samsung NX300
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone port
touchscreen
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 III vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Samsung NX300 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2013-11-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic IX | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 247 |
| Cross focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Available lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 768k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) | 331 gr (0.73 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $1,800 | $750 |